C-313/02, Wippel v Peek & Cloppenburg

C-313/02, Wippel v Peek & Cloppenburg
Photo by Museums Victoria / Unsplash

• Context: This case concerns Article 45 TFEU (Free Movement of Persons), focusing on who qualifies as a "worker" under EU law.

• Facts: Wippel was employed under a ‘zero hours’ contract, meaning the employer was not obliged to provide a minimum number of working hours.

• Outcome: The ECJ held that individuals on zero hours contracts are considered workers under EU law.

◦ Definition of Worker: Under Article 45 TFEU, the term "worker" includes individuals on zero hours contracts. The nature of the contract does not disqualify them from being considered workers if it meets the general criteria of employment.

◦ Employment Status: Despite the non-guaranteed hours, such workers are protected under the free movement provisions, affirming their status as workers.