Chan Pui Chun v Leung Kam Ho & Anor [2001]

Key Points of the Case:

• Background: Miss Chan left her family and gave up her career to live with the landowner and start a business together.

• Claim: Miss Chan sought a share in the business under proprietary estoppel, arguing that her significant personal and professional sacrifices were made in reliance on the landowner’s assurances.

• Outcome: The court established proprietary estoppel in her favour, recognising her claim to a share in the business.

• Reasoning: The court determined that Miss Chan's actions and sacrifices could not be explained solely by her personal affection for the landowner. Her reliance on the promises made was a crucial factor in the decision.

• Impact: This case highlights that proprietary estoppel can be established even when personal motivations, such as love, are involved, provided there is substantial reliance on assurances leading to significant detriment.