DPP v Majewski [1977]

1. Facts:

• D assaulted a police officer while voluntarily intoxicated.

2. Outcome:

• Conviction for ABH was upheld.

3. Impact and Analysis:

• Distinction Between Specific and Basic Intent:

◦ Specific Intent: Voluntary intoxication can be a defence if it negates the specific intent required for the offence (e.g., murder).

◦ Basic Intent: Voluntary intoxication is not a defence for crimes of basic intent, such as ABH, where recklessness or negligence suffices for the mens rea.

• Legal Precedent: Established a clear legal distinction in how voluntary intoxication affects criminal liability based on the type of intent required for the offence.

• Culpability: Reinforced that voluntary intoxication does not absolve individuals of responsibility for actions requiring basic intent.