L v L [2012]

Key Points:

• Case Background:

◦ The court found that the children were being harmed by ongoing arguments between the husband and wife. The mother, being the primary carer, was directly involved in these disputes.

• Legal Decision:

◦ To protect the children's well-being and minimise their exposure to conflict, the court decided that the husband should leave the home. This allowed the children to remain in a stable environment with their primary carer.

Implications:

• Welfare Priority:

◦ L v L underscores the court's commitment to prioritising the welfare of children. The decision reflects the need to remove sources of harm and maintain stability in the children's living situation.