Monaghan [2000]

1. Facts:

• V was ‘jostled’ during a theft.

2. Outcome:

• Decision: Only theft was charged.

3. Impact and Analysis:

• Legal Principle: The case highlights that minor physical interactions during a theft, such as jostling, do not necessarily elevate the offence to robbery.

• Implications: This decision underscores the importance of distinguishing between simple theft and robbery based on the level of force used. Minimal force or incidental contact typically remains within the scope of theft rather than escalating to robbery.