P v DPP [2012]

1. Facts:

• D snatched a cigarette from V’s mouth.

2. Outcome:

• Decision: The act was held not to constitute robbery, applying the de minimis principle.

3. Impact and Analysis:

• Legal Principle: This case demonstrates the application of the de minimis principle, where minor or trivial acts of force do not meet the threshold for robbery.

• Implications: The ruling suggests that not all physical interactions in the context of theft will elevate the offence to robbery. However, if D's actions involved more aggressive or threatening behaviour, such as running at V aggressively while snatching the cigarette, it could be considered robbery. The case highlights the importance of the context and nature of the force used in determining the appropriate charge.