Pearson’s Case [1835]

1. Facts:

• D was involuntarily intoxicated.

2. Outcome:

• Recognised involuntary intoxication could be an outright defence.

3. Impact and Analysis:

• Defence of Involuntary Intoxication: Established that involuntary intoxication, where the defendant has no control over their state, could be a complete defence, leading to an acquittal.

• Comparison to Kingston 1995: Highlights how the courts distinguish between voluntary and involuntary intoxication in terms of criminal liability.