R v Allen [1988]

1. Facts:

• D drank wine that had a greater effect on him than anticipated.

• D was convicted of committing burglary and sexual offences while intoxicated.

2. Outcome:

• Conviction upheld.

3. Impact and Analysis:

• Narrow Scope: Reinforced the principle that voluntary intoxication, even if the effects are stronger than expected, does not absolve liability for crimes of basic intent.

• Legal Precedent: Emphasised that misjudging the potency of alcohol or drugs does not provide a defence for criminal actions committed under their influence.