R v Dawson and James [1976]

1. Facts:

• D nudged V while taking V’s wallet.

2. Outcome:

• Decision: This act amounted to robbery, as the force used was deemed sufficient.

3. Impact and Analysis:

• Legal Principle: The case established that even a slight nudge can constitute sufficient force for robbery.

• Implications: The decision broadens the interpretation of what constitutes force in robbery cases, emphasising that any level of physical coercion can be sufficient to meet the criteria for robbery, thereby increasing the severity of the charge.