R v Doyle [2010]

1. Facts:

• Scenario: D and V had been in a sexual relationship for three months, which involved past violence.

• Issue: D claimed that V had consented to sexual activity, while V stated that she had not given consent.

• Charges: D was convicted despite his claim.

2. Outcome:

• Decision: D was convicted of sexual offences.

• Reasoning: The court found that V did not consent to the sexual activity, and D's claim of consent was not accepted.

3. Impact and Analysis:

• Consent: The case underscores the importance of clear, affirmative consent in sexual activities.