R v Dytham [1979]

1. Facts:

• A police officer, Dytham, witnessed a bouncer kicking a man to death.

• Despite being present and observing the violent assault, Dytham did nothing to intervene or protect the victim.

2. Outcome:

• Dytham was convicted of misconduct in public office.

• The conviction was based on his failure to act in his official capacity to prevent harm, despite having the authority and duty to do so.

3. Impact and Analysis:

• Duty to Act: The case established that public officials, particularly those in law enforcement, have a duty to act to prevent and protect individuals from harm while performing their duties.

• Misconduct in Public Office: Dytham’s conviction for misconduct highlighted the legal expectation for police officers to uphold their responsibilities and intervene in criminal activities, reinforcing accountability for neglecting such duties.