R v Lambie [1982]

1. Facts:

• D paid for goods with a stolen credit card, knowing that the authorisation had been withdrawn.

2. Outcome:

• Decision: D was convicted of fraud.

3. Impact and Analysis:

• Legal Principle: This case highlights that using a credit card with knowledge of unauthorised status constitutes fraud.

• Implications: The decision reinforces the criminal liability associated with the use of stolen or unauthorised financial instruments, emphasising the significance of intent and knowledge in fraud cases.