R v Walkington [1979]

1. Facts:

• D entered the attendant’s area at a checkout to look for money.

2. Outcome:

• Decision: D was convicted of burglary for entering part of a building with intent to steal. The counter area was clearly out of bounds.

3. Impact and Analysis:

• Legal Principle: This case demonstrates that entering a restricted area within a building with intent to commit theft can constitute burglary.

• Implications: The ruling clarifies that burglary can occur within any distinct part of a building that is off-limits to the public, highlighting the importance of respecting designated private areas within larger spaces.